Environmental scientists have made it emphatically clear -- coming
about as close as scientists ever come to shouting -- that we are in
trouble. What they point to can be described in terms of four global
"megaphenomena" -- of rising carbon dioxide concentration in the
atmosphere, rising rates of extinction, rising consumption of
resources, and rising population. And all four, after hundreds of
centuries of relative stability, have suddenly spiked.
Plotted on graphs, they look like heart attacks. Population, for
example, now grows by as much every three days as it did every
century, on average, for most of the one-thousand centuries before
the Industrial Revolution. Yet, for all the extraordinary arm-waving
of the scientists, few people seem to see any big problem. We treat
this spasm of biological destruction we've ignited more like
heartburn than heart attack.
The fate of the planet isn't even given much attention by the
editors of the New York Times (which instead published an article
last year titled "The Population Explosion is Over"), not by U.S.
senators, and not by teachers or talk-radio hosts. The scientists,
of course, have no means of reaching people on their own. When they
go to the extraordinary effort of producing documents like the 1992
World Scientists' Warning to Humanity, or the IUCN Red List of
Endangered Plants, they make a few ripples.
But then, again and again, those warnings are either blunted or
pushed to the margins of public awareness. Just as the Kyoto climate
convention was approaching its critical decision point in late 1997,
for example, an article appeared in the Wall Street Journal titled
"Science Has Spoken: Global Warming is a Myth." That article
appeared during the warmest December ever recorded, which came on
the heels of the warmest November and the warmest October. It was a
year in which the American Museum of Natural History had just
reported the results of a poll of experts in the biological
sciences, the majority of whom said they believe our planet is now
undergoing the greatest mass extinction since the dinosaurs were
extinguished.
Why are we not astonished by what is happening to our world? The
answer is complicated, but here are a few parts of it:
-
In this "information age," we have access to vast amounts of
information, but the quality of what we have access to is
increasingly questionable. Real news reporting is buried under a
landslide of prepackaged news planted by corporate PR, ideological
groups and other entities interested in manipulating how we act and
consume. The Wall Street Journal's "Global Warming is a Myth"
article, for example, was planted by an Oregon-based front group for
the industries that have an interest in seeing the climate treaty
scuttled. Real news is buried from one side by a river of PR and
from the other side by a growing pressure from the dominant media
conglomerates to select news for its entertainment value.
-
Our sources of belief have become less trustworthy. Once they
were mainly our parents, elders, teachers, neighbors, and other
people we grew up with and spent time with personally. Those sources
were sometimes right and sometimes sadly wrong, but at least they
didn't systematically exploit or deceive us by the millions, for
purposes unrelated to our own well-being. Only in the last
half-century -- the last 0.05 percent or less of our experience as a
species -- have we suddenly shifted to a heavy reliance on surrogate
sources of belief: TV depictions of parents (often characterized as
amiable fools or foils for the dominant youth culture),
inspirational televangelists, morally outraged radio ideologues, and
charismatic authors of best-selling books on "success."
-
We're stressed out by unprecedented levels of environmental and
social destabilization: 500-year floods, devastating hurricanes,
increasingly severe water shortages, unexpected crop failures,
resurgent diseases and guerrilla wars. Often the reaction to such
stress is to flee -- not just physically, but emotionally and
cognitively. People who have money often flee from the pain of their
lives by consuming. I suspect that overconsumption on a societal
scale may be driven by the same insecurity -- or sense of emptiness
-- writ large.
-
Our world has been turned inside-out by entertainment. Once it
was built around work; now it's made up of thrills. In industrial
countries, entertainment has become the kind of dominant business
that manufacturing once was. In Texas, which is part of what was
once called the great American wheat belt, the estimated market
value of just two entertainment businesses last year -- the Dallas
Cowboys and Houston Oilers football franchises -- was greater (at
$735 million) than the total value of the wheat that state grew
($600 million). The loci of our entertainments are artificial
environments -- stadiums and auditoriums and the interiors of cars,
instead of canyons and vales and dells; earphones instead of the
sounds of birds or wind; and the false fictions of TV ads and
sitcoms instead of reality. If we're not astonished by what's
happening to our world, maybe it's in part because, being constantly
cut off from it, we no longer have any strong expectations to begin
with.
- The disconnection is worsened by systemic misuses of technology.
Consider, for example, the soaring dissemination of automated toys
and games that provide the propulsion, conflict or imagery once
provided by children's arms, legs and imaginations. Not only does
that vastly enlarge the amount of plastics and metals needed to
bring up children, but it renders the children more passive and
dependent on still greater stimulation. In a Toys-R-Us world, we
spend more and more to bring up kids who are less and less connected
to what keeps them alive.
-
The obsession with technology has led us into increasing
specialization. And that makes it harder for us to see the whole
picture. If you are an expert and you discover something curious,
there's a good chance that only your colleagues in the field can
really grasp it. Most experts no longer try to keep in contact with
the rest of us. Think of the center as the common ground of those of
us who are still close enough to each other to be able to integrate
our collective knowledge and make it work as a system. It is our
cultural and ecological integrity. The way expertise is exploding,
the center can't much longer hold.
What to do? Most analysts, including us World Watchers, try to
approach this question in terms of policy. But while that's
necessary, it may not be enough. Good policy arguably does for human
behavior what end-of-pipe control does for pollution. So, just as
pollution is more effectively attacked at the source, attitudes need
attacking at their sources -- in the education of kids by parents
and schools, in the learning environment we grow up in, in the
curricula of universities, in the accountability of media. We need
to revisit how people learn (or don't learn) from the first gasp of
life to the last, because today's average upper-middle class college
grad, when you strip away what he knows about entertainment and
technology, has a medieval understanding of the world. That
understanding won't get us through the next century.
(Ed Ayres is editor of World Watch. This essay is adapted from his
book, "God's Last Offer: Negotiating for a Sustainable Future," published by Four Walls Eight Windows.)